For Data Governance and Metadata Leads

Make the glossary definition the one the dashboard runs

Your program already has the policy, the glossary, and a steward network. MetaKarta compiles governed definitions into the systems that compute the numbers, keeps catalog coverage tied to the live estate, and answers any audit question with a query.

Key capabilities

Governed definitions compiled into BI tools and warehouses

Version history and attribution on every definition change

Catalog coverage harvested from the live estate

Business vocabulary reconciled against what BI computes

The Problem

The glossary and the dashboard drifted apart

The glossary says what revenue means. The Power BI measure computes something else, and you find out when someone escalates a number.

Catalog population depends on steward attendance, so coverage stalls and descriptions go stale. Stewardship is volunteer work, and every departure resets progress.

Then the audit arrives, and the history of a definition gets rebuilt from tickets, spreadsheets, and memory, the same as last cycle.

The Approach

Policy applied where the data is used, versioned where it changed

MetaKarta compiles governed definitions into the native artifacts of the systems that consume them: Power BI, Tableau, Snowflake Semantic Views, and Databricks Metric Views. The definition the steward approved is the definition the dashboard runs.

400+ native connectors harvest metadata directly from the estate, and parser-based lineage connects each asset from source to report. Stewards spend their time on the calls only they can make: ownership, meaning, and approval.

The full metadata estate sits under version and configuration management. The audit answer is a query: what a metric meant on any date, who changed it, and why.

What Changes

Every definition can defend itself

Each definition carries its owner, its version history, and the systems it compiles into.

Coverage that grows with the estate

Harvesting keeps the catalog tied to what exists, so coverage stops tracking steward attendance.

AI under the same policy

MetaKarta MCP serves approved definitions to agents with per-user access tokens, and every response returns the metadata evidence that produced it.

Use cases for data governance leads

Can we prove it to the auditor?

Demonstrate version history, point-of-use policy, and the full provenance chain for any definition. The audit answer is a query: what a metric meant on any date, who changed it, and where it flowed.

How many tools are we paying to keep in sync?

Replace an assembled solution of metadata tools with one platform. Lineage, catalog, governance, and compiled semantics operate on a shared foundation. The integration work disappears along with the licenses.

Why don't the numbers match?

Define each metric once and compile it natively into every BI tool. Power BI and Tableau return the same revenue number because both read the same governed definition. There's nothing left to reconcile.

Frequently asked
questions

We already own a catalog. Where does MetaKarta fit?

The program matured past what a documentation tool can carry. The purchase was right for a program whose job was to describe policy; the job changed when AI and auditors started asking for enforcement evidence.

How does MetaKarta catch drift between the glossary and BI?

Ontology Modeling live-links each vocabulary term to the metric that implements it and reconciles the ontology against what BI actually implements. A divergence shows up as a mismatch you can review before someone escalates a number.

What happens to our steward network?

Stewards move up a level. Harvesting and lineage keep coverage current, and stewards set guardrails, define what good looks like, and review exceptions.

Which regulations does the audit trail support?

SOX, BCBS 239, CSRD, ISSB, and AI audit mandates. Every definition has an owner, a version history, and a record of where it flowed.

Can we show that a policy was applied, beyond documenting it?

Yes. Governed definitions compile into native artifacts inside your BI tools and warehouse, and security policies compile into each target's native controls. The compiled artifact is the proof.

How do agents respect our access policies?

MetaKarta MCP uses per-user access tokens, so an agent sees exactly what the person behind it is authorized to see. Every response returns the metadata evidence that produced it.

Where does MetaKarta's technology come from?

Nearly 30 years of metadata engineering. MetaKarta's technology runs inside the products of Microsoft Purview, Informatica from Salesforce, IBM, Oracle, and Qlik Talend.